16 October 1963

 

(Mother first reads two lines from The Debate of Love and Death in Savitri. She would like to put them as epigraph to the conversation of September 7, the dialogue with a materialist.)

 

Listen to this:

 

O Death, thou speakest Truth but Truth that slays,

I answer to thee with the Truth that saves.

(Savitri, p. 621)

 

It's beautiful!

 

So the materialist ... "O Death, thou speakest Truth...." What can he reply? It's the Truth!

 


27 November 1963

 

It's like in Savitri, when he speaks of the "consciousness that fell asleep in the dust" … the divine Consciousness that fell asleep in the dust of its creation (I am embroidering). The divine Consciousness, the eternal Mother, that is, fell asleep in the dust of her creation; somebody wakes her up, and She realizes (this isn't from Sri Aurobindo!), She realizes (laughing) that it's the supreme Lord who shook her! So She does everything, all sorts of extraordinary things, anything to stop Him from going away! (Mother takes up Savitri)

 

She reposes motionless in its dust of sleep.

(Savitri, p. 180)

 

Then:

 

For him she leaped forth from the unseen Vasts

To move here in a stark unconscious world.

(Savitri, p. 181)

 

And then:

 

In beauty she treasures the sunlight of his smile.

Ashamed of her rich cosmic poverty....

(Savitri, p. 181)

 

Splendid!

 

And woos his large-eyed wandering thoughts to dwell

In figures of her million-impulsed Force.

Only to attract her veiled companion

And keep him close to her breast in her world-cloak

Lest from her arms he turn to his formless peace,

Is her heart's business and her clinging care.

(Savitri, p. 181)

 


7 December 1963

 

There are lots of things which people don't even take notice of in life (when they live an ordinary life, they don't take any notice), there's a whole field of things that are absolutely … not quite unconscious, but certainly not conscious; they are reflexesreflexes, reactions to stimuli, and so onand also the response (a semiconscious, barely conscious response) to the pressure exerted from above by the Force, which people are totally unconscious of. It is the study of this question which is now in the works; I am very much occupied with it. A study of every secondYou see, there are different ways for the Lord to be present, it's very interesting (the difference isn't for Him, it's for us!), and it depends precisely on the amount of habitual reflex movements that take place almost outside our observation (generally completely outside it) And this question preoccupied me very, very much: the ways of feeling the Lord's Presencethe different ways. There is a way in which you feel it as something vague, but of which you are sureyou are always sure but the sensation is vague and a bit blurredand at other times it is an acute Presence [1] (Mother touches her face), very precise, in all that you do, all that you feel, all that you are. There is an entire range. And then if we follow the movement (gesture in stages, moving away), there are those who are so far away, so far, that they don't feel anything at all.

 

This experience made me write something yesterday (but it has lasted several days), it came as the outcome of the work done, and yesterday I wrote it both in English and in French:

 

There is no other sin, no other vice than to be far from Thee.

 

Then, the entire world, the universe, appeared to me in that light, and at every point (which takes up no space), at every point of the universe and throughout the universe, it's that way. Not that there are far and near places in the universe, that's not what I mean (it's beyond space), but there is a whole hierarchy of nearness, up to something that doesn't feel and doesn't knowit's not that it is outside, because nothing can be outside the Lord, but it is as if the extreme limit: so far away, so far, so farabsolutely blackthat He seems not to reach there.

 

It was a very total vision. And such an acute experience that it seemed to be the only true thing. It didn't take up any space, yet there was that sensation of nearness and farness. And there was a kind of Focus, or a Center, I can't say (but it was everywhere), which was the climax of Thee—purely Thee. And it had a quality of its own. Then it began to move farther and farther away, which produced a kind of mixture with something ... that was nothingthat didn't existbut that altered the vibration, the intensity, which made it move farther and farther away to ... Darknessunconscious Darkness.

 

And something kept coming again and again to me: there is no other sin ... (because this followed a few lines I read in Savitri on the glorification of sin in the vital world, the words came to me because of that) ... there is no other sin, no other vice than to be far from Thee.

 

It seemed to explain everything.

 

It wasn't I who wrote it! There's no "I" in it: it comes just like that.

 

The far from Thee is so, so intense in its vibration, it has a concrete meaning.

 

And that's the only thing: all the rest, all moral notions, everything, everything, even the notion of Ignorance ... it all becomes mental chatter. But this, this experience, is marvelous. Far from Thee ...

 

[1] The Mother developed this passage in the conversation dated 11 December 1963.

 


31 December 1963

 

Ah, exactly! That's it. That's it! Every day, I look at it. In the evening the date and the quotation are changed—I don't know what tomorrow's text will be, we have to change the calendar and start "January." Would you like us to do it? Bring the calendar here.

 

All this will go now!

 

We have December here. (Mother reads)

 

And earth shall be the Spirit's manifest home.

(Savitri, p. 707)

 

Is it the promise that came?

 

Yes, the promise of the G. The G always promises.


(Mother sets the calendar to January 1, 1964, and reads Sri Aurobindo's quotation)

 

All can be done if God's touch is there.

 

There: All can be done. All.

 

I like this calendar a lot because of its quotations. I change it every evening.

 

Tomorrow, I see here ... (Mother looks at her notebook) four, five, six, seven, eight people, and two over there, which makes tentomorrow morning between 10 and 11 AM (Laughing) "All can be done if God's touch is there"!

 

So I'll see you next year.

 

Did I give you everything? Did I give you the second calendar [with a photograph of Mother, printed in Calcutta]? The other one, he [another disciple] didn't like it.

 

You're too stern, little Mother!

 

Ah, there we are again! But I wasn't stern: I was in contemplation!

 

A stern contemplation.

 

(On the second calendar, the photograph shows Mother engaged in her translation work)

 

It's the last part of the Synthesis. [1] We were supposed to revise it together, but it doesn't work.... (to the disciple) You know what he does? He takes the English and starts translating again! (laughing) So there's no work left for me!

 

The conclusion is that when he has finished his book, I'll give you my manuscript to type. If my eyes were good, it would do, but they're no good, the poor things (I can't speak ill of them, they've served well, but anyway ...) Or else, he [the disciple] would have to correct directly on my manuscript, but that he won't do.

 

Ah, no!

 

So it's no use.

 

(A little later)

 

In fact, in Savitri, Sri Aurobindo went through all the worlds, and it so happens that I am following that without knowing it (because I never rememberthank God, I really thank heaven!I asked the Lord to take away my mental memory and He took it away entirely, so I am not weighed down), but I follow that description in Savitri without mentally knowing the sequence of the worlds, and these last few days ... I was in that Muddle of Falsehood (I told you last time), it was really painful, and I was tracking it down to the most tenuous vibrations, those that go back to the origin, to the moment when Truth could turn into Falsehoodhow it all happened. And it is so tenuous, almost imperceptible, that deformation, the original Deformation, that you tend to lose heart and you think, "It's still really quite easy to topple over ... the slightest thing and you can still topple over into Falsehood, into Deformation." And yesterday, I had in my hands a passage from Savitri that was brought to meit's a marvel, but ... it's so sad, so miserable, oh, I could have cried (I don't easily cry).

 

The world grew full of menacing Energies,

And wherever turned for help or hope his eyes,

In field and house, in street and camp and mart,

He met the prowl and stealthy come and go

Of armed disquieting bodied Influences.

A march of goddess figures dark and nude

Alarmed the air with grandiose unease;

Appalling footsteps drew invisibly near,

Shapes that were threats invaded the dream-light,

And ominous beings passed him on the road

Whose very gaze was a calamity:

A charm and sweetness sudden and formidable,

Faces that raised alluring lips and eyes

Approached him armed with beauty like a snare,

But hid a fatal meaning in each line

And could in a moment dangerously change.

But he alone discerned that screened attack.

(Savitri, pp. 205-06)

 

It makes you wonder ... It's like something gluey surrounding you, touching you all over; you can't go forward, you can't do anything without encountering those black and gluey fingers of Falsehood. It was a very painful impression.

 

And last night, there was the Answer, as it were. This morning, when I got up, I didn't remember clearly, but in the middle of the night I knew it very well. (It's not going from sleep to the waking consciousness: it is coming out of one state to enter another one, and when I came out of that state to enter the so-called normal one, I remembered very well.) I was as if made to live the WAY of turning that Falsehood into Truth, and it was so joyful! ... So joyful. In the sense that it's a vibration similar to joy that is capable of dissolving and overcoming the vibration of Falsehood. That was very important: it isn't effort, it isn't righteousness, or scruple or rigidity, none of that, none of that has any effect on that sadness (it is a sadness) of Falsehoodit's something so sad, so helpless, so miserable ... so miserable. And only a vibration of Joy can change it.

 

It was a vibration that flowed like silvery waterit rippled and flowed like silvery water.

 

Which means that austerity, asceticism, even an intense and stern aspiration, all sternness, all that: no action. No actionFalsehood stays put in the background But it cannot resist the sparkling of joy. It's interesting.

 

(silence)

 

And in his text, Sri Aurobindo says that the Lord joins the contraries, the opposites, puts them together so they fight each other, and that this will and action give Him a sardonic smile (I am commenting).

 

A tract he reached unbuilt and owned by none:

There all could enter but none stay for long.

It was a no man's land of evil air,

A crowded neighbourhood without one home,

A borderland between the world and hell.

There unreality was Nature's Lord:

It was a space where nothing could be true,

For nothing was what it had claimed to be:

A high appearance wrapped a spacious void.

Yet nothing would confess its own pretence

Even to itself in the ambiguous heart:

A vast deception was the law of things;

Only by that deception they could live.

An unsubstantial Nihil guaranteed

The falsehood of the forms this Nature took

And made them seem awhile to be and live.

A borrowed magic drew them from the Void;

They took a shape and stuff that was not theirs

And showed a colour that they could not keep,

Mirrors to a fantasm of reality.

Each rainbow brilliance was a splendid lie;

A beauty unreal graced a glamour face.

Nothing could be relied on to remain:

Joy nurtured tears and good an evil proved,

But never out of evil one plucked good:

Love ended early in hate, delight killed with pain,

Truth into falsity grew and death ruled life.

A Power that laughed at the mischief of the world,

An irony that joined the world's contraries

And flung them into each other's arms to strive,

Put a sardonic rictus on God's face.

(Savitri, pp. 206-07)

 

I was asked for an illustration for Huta; I saw the image, the Lord's face with a sardonic smile. And then, after last night's experience, this morning suddenly that expression of the face changed, and I saw the image of the true, the true sorrow of CompassionI don't know how to explain it ... The sardonic smile changed: from sardonic it grew bitter, from bitter it grew sorrowful, from sorrowful it grew full of an extraordinary compassion ...

 

(silence)

 

So we could say that Falsehood is the sorrow of the Lord.  And that His Joy is the cure for all Falsehood.

 

Sorrow had to be expressed so as to be erased from the creation.

 

And sorrow is Falsehoodthe Lord's sorrow, sorrow in its essence, is Falsehood.

 

So to live in Falsehood is to hurt the Lord.

 

It opens up horizons ...

 

And His Joy is the cure for everything.

 

That's the problem seen from the other angle.

 

So, if we love the Lord, we cannot give Him cause for sorrow, and necessarily we emerge from Falsehood and enter Joy.

 

That's what I saw last night. It was all silvery. All silvery, silvery ...

 

There was even the vision of how the vibrations were in the cells: vibrations that were silvery, sparkling, rippling, but very regular, and precise ... (how can I put it?). It was the contradiction of Falsehood in the cells; like little flashes of silvery light.

 

But that [Falsehood] is the great obstacle, the extreme difficulty. It's something gluey which entered the creation and sticks to everything, and which has become a material habit too, because it's not only Mind that has Falsehood in it: there's Falsehood in Life, in Life itself. In the completely inanimate, I don't know.... Maybe it came with Life? (According to Savitri, the origin of Falsehood lies in Life.) But it's as though Unconsciousness, in order to go towards Consciousness, to return to Consciousness, had taken the path of Falsehood and Death instead of the path of Truth.

 

And Falsehood is this: the sorrow of the Lord.

 

I was asked for a message for next year, and things of that sort kept coming to me, so I didn't say anything. They wouldn't even understand, it's incomprehensible if you don't have the experience. And if you say just like that, almost dogmatically, "Falsehood is the sorrow of the Lord," it doesn't mean anything.

 

Or if you say it in a literary way, it's no longer true.

 

And if you said, "Falsehood is the Lord's way of being unhappy" (!) (Mother laughs), people would think you're not being serious.

 

Well. My children, I think it's time to go and do our work. I wish you a happy new year!

 

[1] In fact, the passage Mother is seen translating in the photograph is from Savitri (p. 55):


Our will [shall be] a force of the Eternal's power,

And thought the rays of a spiritual sun.



 


In the course of her conversations with a disciple, the Mother on several occasions made comments about Sri Aurobindo’s transformative epic Savitri. We are reproducing these here, with our deep and sincere thanks to Narad who has done this excellent piece of work. The series will cover these comments yearwise. The expectation is that we will grow in the richness of the insights and revelations given to us by the Mother.


Courtesy: http://savitribysriaurobindo.com/savitri_conversations.htm