Mortality bears ill the eternal’s
touch…
It trembles at its naked power of
Truth
And the might and sweetness of its
absolute Voice.
Inflicting on the heights the
abysm’s law,
It sullies with its mire heaven’s
messengers:
Its thorns of fallen nature are the
defence
It meets the son of God with death
and pain.
A glory of lightnings traversing
the earth-scene,
Their sun-thoughs fading, darkened
by ignorant minds,
Their work betrayed, their good to
evil turned,
The cross their payment for the
crown they gave…
The image of cross appears in
several places in Savitri. But Savitri’s
cross is also the sign of her complete surrender to the Supreme, she going by
the Will of the Lord whatever be the difficulty. The divine descent meets the
barring line, the incarnation the yoke of misery, the being of knowledge the
affliction of ignorance, love hatred. Unless this is experienced, there cannot
be any solution to it. The Divine has to come down and carry on his shoulder
the heavy wooden cross, must pant for breath. The way to heaven is through the
way of suffering. He himself must bear the Cross.
Sri Aurobindo writes: “All true Truth of love and of the works of love the
psychic being accepts in their place: but its flame mounts always upward and it
is eager to push the ascent from lesser to higher degrees of Truth, since it
knows that only by the ascent to a highest Truth and the descent of that
highest Truth can Love be delivered from the cross and placed upon the throne;
for the cross is the sign of the Divine Descent barred and marred by the
transversal line of a cosmic deformation which turns it into a stake of
suffering and misfortune. Only by the ascent to the original Truth can the
deformation be healed and all the works of love, as too all the works of
knowledge and of life, be restored to a divine significance and become part of
an integral spiritual existence.” (The
Synthesis of Yoga, p. 157)
One may acquire a kind of divine equality, samatā,
in all circumstances of life, including even the extreme of deathful anguish;
but there must yet come a degree of perfection surpassing everything. The key
for this perfection could be in accepting in all gladness the circumstances as
they are as a god-given opportunity, in remaining untouched by them. But the
truer way is the way of surrender, surrender to both the divine Will and the
divine Wisdom which are actually one. That is the perfect way to bear the
weight of the cross, recognising in it the way of the divine Love.
That is the way Savitri follows, the way of perfect surrender to the Supreme.
She carries the cross of suffering and pain, not just submitting but
surrendering herself to the Will and Wisdom of the Divine.
The cross their payment: Cross
means progress for those who suffer for it, and not who fight for it. But here
is the Mother about the Cross: (Collected
Works of the Mother, Vol. 4)
Even higher beings have their cross
to bear. It is a question of a difference of consciousness. In some it is the
external states of consciousness which are most developed; others, on the
contrary, have taken care to develop the higher states of consciousness. So, to
say ‘each one bears his cross’ is true of the external consciousness (of
material happenings, happenings which touch the vital being, the emotional
being and the mental being); for such people there will always be a
considerable number of catastrophes, all the more because catastrophes seem to
be proportionate to the capacity of the individual, they seem to be dealt out
according to his capacity to bear things. It may just be that those who have
greater capacities have an over-plus of suffering and misfortune.
But there are people who are above all misfortune and yet misfortunes exist for
them. Why? Because the inner consciousness in them is stronger, more developed
than the other consciousness (I do not speak here of ‘transformed’ beings, for
in them one can conceive of a state of things in which even the physical being
is above suffering; we are speaking of men as they are at present). If your
consciousness is seated in a place where these external things do not exist,
then it may be said that you do not bear your cross because you are above it.
Yet there are exceptions, there are human beings who are above afflictions, yet
carry their cross.
There is a state of human consciousness (it is not yet superhuman, it is truly
human) in which the two things may coexist. One may have sufferings and not
feel them, be as if they did not exist. That is, a misfortune, a ‘cross’
touches only the outer consciousness, the physical, the mental, the vital, but
the psychic —in truth, the psychic is above all suffering. Let us take a very
simple example: an illness. A physical disorder brings suffering, at times much
suffering, but there are people who are in such a state of consciousness that
their physical sufferings do not exist, they are not real for them. It is the
same thing with separation; if you love someone and are separated from that
person, you suffer—this is one of the most common of sufferings, it is the ties
which are broken—well, in a certain state of consciousness the real link
between two beings cannot be broken, for it does not belong to the domain where
things break. Therefore one is above what may happen.
Throughout human history it has been thus. Those who have come with special
abilities, a special grace, and have tried to make men come out of their
ordinary rut, have been more or less persecuted, martyred, burnt alive, put on
the cross. ... The situation now is apparently a little better because now
slightly more plausible reasons than those of old are needed to burn men—the
habit of doing so is no longer there—but the feelings are not very different.
The human race, generally, has a sort of rancour against what surpasses it; it
feels humiliated, and men do not like to be humiliated.
Don’t you know that there are three principles: the transcendent, the universal
and the individual or personal? No?—the transcendent which is above creation,
at the origin of creation; the universal which is the creation, and the
individual which is self-explanatory. There is a transcendent Divine, a
universal Divine and an individual Divine. That is, one may put oneself in
contact with the divine Consciousness within oneself, in the universe and,
beyond all forms, in the transcendent. So these three aspects are also the three
aspects of the divine Mother: transcendent, universal and individual.... Do you
know the flower I have called Transformation? You know it has four petals.
Well, these four petals are arranged like a cross: one at the top which
represents the transcendent; two on each side, the universal; and one at the
bottom, the individual. The petal at the top is divided into two. Exactly, the
transcendent is one and two (or dual) at the same time. This flower is almost
perfect in its form. This was the original meaning of the cross also, but that
was not as perfect as the flower, for it was one, two, and three. It was not so
good —the flower is perfect.
Let us see the line “Earth saw my
struggle, heaven my victory” (Savitri,
p. 638) in the context of the present discussion pertaining to the opening
canto of the poem.
This is what Savitri tells to Yama,
the God of Death from whom she is claiming back the soul of her deceased
husband, Satyavan. Yama had all along remained unconvinced by Savitri’s
powerful arguments and was not ready to release the soul he was carrying with
him. And one of the arguments Savitri puts forward is, about her struggle and
her victory. Her argument is preceded by a statement that, it is in her
unceasing fire that the great stars burn, the fire whose faggots are life and
death.
The point is, Savitri cannot win
the victory in life if she lacks death, unless she has experience of death she
cannot experience life. She has to conquer death in order to conquer life. That
is true, indeed. The stars in the night get their supernatural fuel from both
life and death. That is the mystery of the stars as against the mystery of the
suns whose fuel comes from no other source than the transcendental Fire, the
divine Agni who knows no night. He gives immortality to form.
But at the moment Savitri is stuck, even as Yama remains unyielding, Yama the
iron Law of Inconscience. The debate between Yama and Savitri, we must recognize
and understand, is not just a set of wordy arguments, not just a profound
metaphysical dialogue, a verbal engagement, a conjuration of one-upmanship, not
even sharp and cutting logomachy. With each utterance of theirs, vast occult
forces are released into the deep occult universe, forces clashing one against
the other in the cosmic functioning. But Savitri has no other choice but to
win. She must conquer death to conquer life. With the power of her total
surrender she must carry the cross on her shoulder. The plight in which she
finds herself at present is tellingly described in these lines of the opening
canto. She has lifted the burden of man on her shoulders and for than man is
ungrateful. Even this eventuality she must meet.
Savitri has to accept the gift of
mortality before she can accept the gift of immortality. What is the gift of
mortality? It is sorrow, pain, suffering, humiliation, infliction of hatred and
jealousy: the cross. Unless she bears the cross how can she know what human
suffering is? But her way of bearing the cross is to fight in the Will and
Wisdom of the Lord for whom she is willing to go to whatever extent it might be
necessary.
Here is a gruesome account of
crucifixion Jesus faced, taken from Internet:
Crucifixion typically began with a scourging or flogging of the victim’s back.
The Romans used a whip called a flagrum, which consisted of small pieces of
bone and metal attached to a number of leather strands. The number of blows
given to Jesus is not recorded; however, the number of blows in Jewish law was
39 (one less than the 40 called for in the Torah, to prevent a counting error).
During the scourging, the skin was ripped from the back, exposing a bloody mass
of tissue and bone. Extreme blood loss occurred, often causing death, or at
least unconsciousness. In addition to the flogging, Jesus faced severe beating
and torment by the Roman soldiers, including the plucking of His beard and the
piercing of His scalp with a crown of thorns.
After the flogging, the victim was often forced to carry his own crossbar, or
patibulum, to the execution site. The patibulum could easily weigh 100 pounds.
In the case of Jesus, the record shows that He may have carried His patibulum
the distance of over two football fields. In a weak and tormented state, it’s
no wonder the record establishes that Jesus needed a great deal of assistance. Once
the victim arrived at the execution site, the patibulum was put on the ground
and the victim was forced to lie upon it. Spikes about 7 inches long and 3/8 of
an inch in diameter were driven into the wrists. The spikes would hit the area
of the median nerve, causing shocks of pain up the arms to the shoulders and
neck. Already standing at the crucifixion site would be the 7-foot-tall post,
called a stipes. In the center of the stipes was a crude seat to “support” for
the victim. The patibulum was then lifted on to the stipes, and the victim’s
body was awkwardly turned on the seat so that the feet could be nailed to the
stipes. At this point, there was tremendous strain put on the wrists, arms and
shoulders, resulting in a dislocation of the shoulder and elbow joints. The
position of the nailed body held the victim’s rib cage in a fixed position,
which made it extremely difficult to exhale, and impossible to take a full
breath. Having suffered from the scourging, the beatings and the walk with the
patibulum, Jesus was described as extremely weak and dehydrated. He was
probably losing significant amounts of blood. As time passed, the loss of blood
and lack of oxygen would cause severe cramps, spasmodic contractions and
probably
nconsciousness.
Ultimately, the mechanism of death in crucifixion was suffocation. To breathe,
the victim was forced to push up on his feet to allow for inflation of the
lungs. As the body weakened and pain in the feet and legs became unbearable,
the victim was forced to trade breathing for pain and exhaustion. Eventually,
the victim would succumb in this way, becoming utterly exhausted or lapsing
into unconsciousness so that he could no longer lift his body off the stipes
and inflate his lungs. Due to the shallow breathing, the victim’s lungs would
begin to collapse in areas, probably causing hypoxia. Due to the loss of blood
from the scourging, the victim probably formed a respiratory acidosis,
resulting in an increased strain on the heart, which beats faster to
compensate. Fluid would also build up in the lungs. Under the stress of hypoxia
and acidosis, the heart would eventually fail. There are several different
theories on the actual cause of death for Jesus. One theory is that there was a
filling of the pericardium with fluid, which put a fatal strain on the ability
of His heart to pump blood. Another theory states that Jesus died of cardiac
rupture. Another theory is that Jesus' death was “multifactorial and related
primarily to hypovolemic shock, exhaustion asphyxia and perhaps acute heart
failure.” Regardless of the actual medical cause of final death, the historical
record is very clear—Jesus suffered numerous hours of horrible and sustained
torture on the cross of