Savitri joins the eager crowd that heard the brilliant Summoner’s call. She is here now, amongst us, foregoing her majesty and her great world of happiness; she is here in this small dingy place to pursue her ageless undertaking, the task pertaining to this mortal creation. She has condescended to pass through the portals of the heavy and sullen birth, the birth that is a perpetual death. She is here where death is a mechanism for the progress of life. But this ought to end. She is here to terminate that process and make life grow by the true truth of life, that is, by love. She is here among the tribes of men lifting up the burden of their harsh and toilsome fate, the primordial fate that in fact, if time has come, must undergo a transformative change. Her coming marks the arrival of that moment. She rejects not the human plight and the travail, the ignominy of mortality—and she does it with full understanding of the issues involved, yet succumbing not to the degradation associated with them.

 

The second section of the Symbol Dawn opens with the description of Savitri’s entering into the human field, the divine Goddess making a purposeful decision to change things by identifying herself with them. She comes but she does not live here in constrained time, with wearied thought, sans love and light. Unless she would bear the heavy yoke of ignorance and death, how could she remove that heavy yoke of ignorance and death? Nor is this identification of hers with this world of ignorance and death a sham—because such identification would leave things essentially as they were in the beginning. Her assumption of humanity is the sign for finding redemption for humanity. She must work out things entirely from within, by living in her soul and her spirit. The greatness of human Savitri is, she holds within her the divine Savitri.

 

The mystery of her birth is that, while she assumes in their trueness the conditions of the ignorant mortal lot, her divine self suffers not any diminution in the process. The veil of thick darkness is there and it fully covers it, but the divine self, the inner light shines steadily underneath it. Something is always there deeply aware within and in it is the certainty of her accomplishing things in the mortal birth. The psychic flame, the spiritual fire, the occult might are always present, undiminished even in the obscurity of the terrestrial nature, in the human mind and the human heart and the human mould. The supreme Nature was once Savitri’s native joyous nature. But now she carries in her bosom the anguish of the gods, she carries the heavenly concern for the mortal creature. The concern is of the deathless being conquered by the death of things. This cannot remain so if life has to grow by love.

 

In her there was the anguish of the gods.


But what exactly is the anguish the gods carry? Powers of light and knowledge, they the gods are there to guide man on the path of the divine. They do that, because in them is the anguish to take man to the divine, to make more and more the entries of the divine in man possible. It is by that anguish that they themselves grow.


But, in the meanwhile, things here are different. Neil Gaiman’s American Gods has a few interesting as well as motivating anxieties, even perplexing anxieties. In the novel he depicts his great Shadow meeting a Modern God named "Media", implying that we now worship The Media instead of Old Gods. That reminds him of "The Fat Kid" who represents Technology, the kid turning out to be cold-hearted and ruthless but insecure and neurotic. The Gods live in a town where there isn't a single bookstore. What a pity! And there the dreamy gawky wizards, the we-all-know scifi-sts speak of a book titled Gravity's Rainbow. How is that rainbow built? But that doesn’t matter, because that is not the issue on hand. What matters is that, that gravity’s rainbow does give scare to the very Ancient Gods, scare as much to the New Gods also, the à la mode Gods. And this is perfectly understandably—that being its nature.


But the gods, ancient or modern, come in various denominations, and one has to be quite wary of the nether Lords. Gaiman’s older gods award a dark feel and the new ones have no light with them. If the gods of infra-rationality are blood-thirsty, the modern are stiff-necked and arrogantly obstinate with their dubious convictions and proud noses. Very often we persuade ourselves of being right and insist that there is required no intruder to meddle into our affairs, maintain that we are ourselves the hewers of the path of our destiny, the unknown path of progress and prosperity, that we are the forerunners and winners of the human race, needing none else to help us.


We have the Gods of Science and Industry, and the Gods of Commerce, and these Gods don’t care about Ecology and the destruction of the Planet; we have a God presiding over the Flat World and Tom Friedman of NYT is his priest; we have the God of Techno-Capitalists charting out the way of the future for us; we have the Gods of Fundamentalists of various hues and shapes, religious, scientific, rationalistic, political, demagogic, and who and what and what not. We must therefore hunt out weapons of mass destruction which don’t exist, because we have made up our mind against somebody as our enemy, because we want to grab his wealth. If these lethal weapons  are not found, it isn’t the proof that they don’t exist. And who cares for life?


The story of concentration camps and gas chimneys during the Second World War is a gruesome story, putting the clock of civilisation before by several dark centuries and millennia, putting the gods to shame. “Mankind, jewel of God’s creation, succeeded in building an inverted Tower of Babel, reaching not toward heaven but toward an anti-heaven, there to create a parallel society, a new ‘creation’ with its own princes and gods, laws and principles, jailers and prisoners.” The child in hiding with his mother asks softly, very softly: "Can I cry now?" It seemed as impossible to conceive of Auschwitz with God as to conceive of Auschwitz without God, says a commentator. Was the frightening Auschwitz a consequence or an aberration of "civilisation"? Scientific abstraction, social and economic contention, nationalism, xenophobia, religious fanaticism, racism, mass hysteria—all found their ultimate expression in it. And then, says Elie Wiesel: “War leaves no victors, only victims.” About his experience in the concentration camp he writes:

 

Never shall I forget that night, the first night in camp, that turned my life into one long night seven times sealed.

Never shall I forget that smoke.

Never shall I forget the small faces of the children whose bodies I saw transformed into smoke under a silent sky.

Never shall I forget those flames that consumed my faith forever.

Never shall I forget the nocturnal silence that deprived me for all eternity of the desire to live.

Never shall I forget those moments that murdered my God and my soul and turned my dreams into ashes.

Never shall I forget those things even were I condemned to live as long as God Himself.
Never.


Auschwitz in Elie Wiesel’s Night is horrifying. “Not far from us,” says he, “flames, huge flames, were rising from a ditch. Something was being burned there. A truck drew close and unloaded its hold: small children. Babies, Yes. I did see this, with my own eyes… children thrown into the flames.” Can there be greater degradation than this?


Where is then the anguish of the gods? Where is it? Or are they asleep? Are they comfortably, deeply, tamasically asleep, eternally asleep in their blissful heaven?


Or is the anguish deeper yet, unfathomably deep, making Auschwitz look petty and small and inconsequential? Is not the distress arising from stiff darkness, ignorance, falsehood, evil, suffering, error, death spread over this globe of ours? Is it not the supposition that, if the cause of this deeper anguish is removed the other little dreadful elements will disappear by themselves? If human reason can be charitable, it might give the benefit of the doubt to Savitri and hope for the best. Indeed,

 

…terrible agencies the Spirit allows

And there are subtle and enormous Powers

That shield themselves with the covering Ignorance.

Offspring of the gulfs, agents of the shadowy Force,

Haters of light, intolerant of peace,

Aping to the thought the shining Friend and Guide,

Opposing in the heart the eternal Will,

They veil the occult uplifting Harmonist.

His wisdom's oracles are made our bonds;

The doors of God they have locked with keys of creed

And shut out by the Law his tireless Grace.

(Savitri, p. 225)


This must cause concern to the best of the gods, the bright gods, the tireless Helpers on the Way of the Future, the Shapers to a great extent of the Human Destinies. But Savitri’s concern is at the foundational level itself, at the root of this creation itself.

 

In fact The Symbol Dawn strikes the first note about this fundamental concern itself, and strikes it in a striking manner. And what is beautiful or significant about it is, the concern is in the transcendental. It is not that the gods have come into cosmic play and are showing concern, that things are perhaps beyond them to mend them. Everything is seen in the transcendental—the repeated coming of the divine Dawn, her pouring the gifts of the revelation and the flame, her iridescence and her glory, her magnificent hues, her sowing the seeds of grandeur in the hour, everything is happening in the transcendent. Among these human tribes Savitri’s awakening too is in the transcendent. She recognizes, over there, the heaviness of the task lying ahead of her. All this, including the false realities of this world, are mirrored over there. The death of Styavan in the prime of his youth is already mirrored in that world of deathless immortality, mirrored fathomlessly. It is to this aspect of the mortal creation that Savitri first awakes in the transcendent. With it she is set to take the mortal birth.

 

But this mortal birth which has already occurred in the transcendental can materialise here, upon earth, in the earthly process, only if a prayer is sent to that transcendental Savitri. But who is going to send that prayer to her? And is she going to oblige to the prayer of any lesser person? But it is the divine Purusha himself who has to invoke her birth, has to demand it, has to compel it. He comes as Aswapati, and does the needed qualifying tapasya, testing its validity in every manner, its needed efficacy at every step, even maintaining the record of his yoga. In that respect, he is not just a pathfinder; he is much more than that. He is actually the path-breaker; he is the strong forerunner, the hewer of the ways of immortality in the mortal creation, on this mŗtyuloka. In response to his ardent, in fact forceful prayer the divine Savitri agrees to take the mortal birth. In that birth she remembers the anguish the gods of the transcendental creation, it carried by them in their deep souls. As human Savitri, aware of it, of that anguish of the gods, occult-yogically she prepares herself to remove it. The felicitous measure of that fulfilment is the measure in the will of the transcendental divine. Whatever has to happen will therefore happen in the supreme Will alone. That is her sun which illumines her way in the cosmic darkness.

 

It must be appreciated that the entire Exordium of Savitri is set in the Transcendental. The difficulty in the march of this creation, with the mind of Night standing across the path of the divine Event, the aspects of two primordial Nothingnesses, the mystery of the fathomless, the absolute Zero, the repeated appearance of the divine Dawn and her work remaining half done,—everything is happening over there. The appearance of the Dawn is first in the transcendental sky, and therefore what is described here, in the opening canto of Savitri, is the illustrious symbol of that marvellous Dawn; the epic begins with the Symbol Dawn for us in which the symbol is for the reality that is set into truth-movement in that high domain of truth and beauty and joy and awareness and love. Which means that, to introduce the poem to us, it is not quite the technique of the flashback that the poet is using here; it is a description of the beginning of the Beginning occurring elsewhere. It is not Horace’s in media res, into the middle of things, the act of plunging into middle of the story; but it is narrating the story which begins at the beginning, ab initio or ab ovo, from the mature ovule, from the egg. Because it is first happening in the high transcendental, there is in it the certitude, the absoluteness of it being victoriously accomplished here. The breaking out of the Dawn in the transcendental is what is presented to us as the Symbol Dawn.